I’ve been trying to get my hands on one of these for a decent price ever since I first saw them. I finally got a good deal through Fanatics with a coupon. I’d still like to pick up a few more Giolito autographs, but this is a start!
I feel like Yoan Moncada is thiiiis close to breaking out as a legit MVP candidate. A bit more power, a bit less called third strikes, and he’s as good as anybody in the AL. He already has the second highest OBP in the league.
With that in mind, I’ve been looking to pick up some Moncada autographs. Until now, I only had two Moncada autographs. His stuff has been pretty pricey, largely based on the fact he was such a huge prospect. In recent days, I found a few good deals that I jumped on. Today I’ll be showing the four items I bought from a promoter on Facebook. Once I receive all of them, I’ll post some premiums that I got for a good price through Fanatics (with a coupon).
I’m really happy to add these items to my Moncada collection. Once I get my stuff from Fanatics, the only thing I’ll still really need is a baseball and his first Bowman Chrome refractor.
Dana Dominion had a signing with 70s/80s Sox star Lamar Johnson. Lamar was one of the last guys I needed from the 1977 team on a “South Side Hitmen” baseball. So I sent in for the signing.
Lamar signing it beautifully, but unfortunately there is a bit of a smudge right in the middle of the autograph. You can’t see it very well in the first photo. I’ll post a second photo with the blue cranked up a bit so you can see it. I’m disappointed in the smudge, but the baseball still looks pretty good.
Philadelphia Connection recently had a private signing with Norberto Martin. I met Norberto a few times in the 90s, and he is a really great guy. He also has a beautiful signature. So I sent in a few cards. I’m relieved to say that I have no complaints about how any of these turned out. They look great!
I sent in 3 cards for a recent Carl Everett signing. I already have Everett on lots of cards, but I still needed his 05 Topps World Series card. So I included a couple other cool cards and sent them in.
Two of the cards turned out great. I’m not very happy with the placement of the signature on the 2005 Donruss Champions bat card. I had a post-it with an arrow pointing at the grey stripe to the left of the bat piece. Instead he signed it the opposite direction of the card, and half in the black. WTF?
The 2000s are probably the low point for Topps designs. There isn’t a single design I love. There is a lot of mediocrity, and one all-time bad design.
I didn’t collect for most of the 2000s. A bit at the beginning of the decade, and then I started up again towards the end of the decade. So nostalgia really won’t play a part in this segment.
#10 – 2002 Topps
I hope the person that decided on the color of this set was fired. It is soooooooo ugly. I’d rather have a bright yellow border, or maybe a nice lavender, than whatever this is. Funnily enough, the Chrome version of this set is probably my favorite Topps Chrome set ever. That shows that the fault isn’t in the design, it’s solely in the color. Also, there isn’t a cool rookie or huge checklist to rescue the set. Last place it is!
#9 – 2007 Topps
I appreciate the attempted callback to the beloved 1971 set, but this is a bust for me. Way too much of the card is taken up by the top and bottom black borders, and the top is mostly wasted space. The little squares in each corner do nothing for me. And don’t get me started on the facsimile signature. The only saving grace of this set is a pretty large checklist, though there are no good rookies.
#8 – 2000 Topps
This is a completely unoffensive looking set. If the border were a more interesting color, even white, it might be a bit higher on the list. But this gray is so drab, I just can’t place it any higher. We also have a mediocre checklist here. They totally missed the boat on a Mark Buehrle rookie card, even in the Traded set. Like 2002, the Chrome version of this set is awesome.
#7 – 2003 Topps
I really struggled with ranking the 2003 set. Why? Well, you see… it’s blue. It’s a really nice, bold shade of blue. But it’s blue, nonetheless. The design is decent enough, and I like the little inset picture at the bottom. But the set is just so… blue. The checklist is fairly large for the era, and there are no notable rookies to speak of.
#6 – 2005 Topps
The 2005 set dropped smack dab in the middle of a three year run of similar looking, white-bordered sets. All three look decent enough, and I have 2005 pulling up the rear. Is this the only Topps set that has text along all four sides of the card? In any case, I have no complaints. I do appreciate the large checklist, especially in the Update set.
#5 – 2006 Topps
2006 is slightly more visually interesting than 2005, but only barely. This is pretty close to a tie. I think the different angles, and splash of color, are what gave 2006 the edge. I now understand the difficult position Topps is in. By the end of 2006, I was begging them to do something different. And then 2007 came out and I hated it.
#4 – 2004 Topps
2004 Topps is my favorite of the three mid-2000s white bordered sets. I like the large team name and silver accents. And I absolutely love the little baseball man in the corner that represents the photo on the card. This set is just so clean looking. It also has a good sized checklist for the era. Once again, there are no rookies to speak of, but that was more of a Sox problem than a Topps problem.
#3 – 2001 Topps
I expected this anniversary release to be lower on the list. I mean, it’s green! It’s a decent shade of green, but the blue used for 2003 was a nicer color. For whatever reason, the 2001 set has a premium feel that no other Topps set of the decade had. I think it’s a combination of the gold accents and cool Topps 50 logo. Whatever it is, the combination gave it a cool look that landed it in the #3 spot.
#2 – 2008 Topps
2008 only has one thing separating it from the 2004-06 sets, and that is the really fun way they’ve laid out the team name here. There is also the strange placement of the Topps logo, but somehow it works. It’s all enough to overcome the dreaded facsimile signature. Are there really people out there clamoring for a fake autograph on their cards?
#1 – 2009 Topps
This is my favorite set of the decade, but it’s a relatively weak #1. It has a really nice, clean design, with the little angled home plate displaying the team logo. The photography of the 08-09 sets seems to pop more than most other Topps sets. It’s an average sized team set for the era, but it’s loaded with stars (by Sox standards). There is something about the Griffey (a player I hate) card pictured to the left that is just so classy.
Earlier this week I received the cards I sent in for the Carlos May signing. I have to admit, I am disappointed with the results. A couple of the cards didn’t turn out at all, and the ones that did still look pretty bad. I’m debating bringing it up with the promoter. But I really hate to be that guy.
I still need May on a 16×20 already signed by Dick Allen. I wanted to send it in for this signing, but it was a mail in signing and they would only take it if it shipped rolled. I’ve had very bad luck with that, as nobody else seems to know how to roll a large photo or poster without it getting damaged in shipping.
Ah, the 1990s. My heyday as a baseball card collector. I actively collected cards from 1990 until some time in 1997. That was the year I graduated from high school, and at that point I stopped collecting cards for 2-3 years.
I was never a Topps guy. I was always an Upper Deck guy. I still collected Topps cards, but viewed them as second class in comparison to Upper Deck. There was Upper Deck, and there was everything else.
#10 – 1994 Topps
For whatever reason, this set has always bugged me. There is nothing overly offensive about the design, it’s just really boring. And I really don’t like the cardstock. It’s kind of glossy, but a very unappealing , half-assed version of glossy. Either make your cards glossy or don’t, I didn’t like this kind of half-hearted attempt. The only good thing about this set is the size of the checklist. They would only get smaller from here.
#9 – 1990 Topps
I just don’t understand what Topps was going for with this set. Ugly design, ugly colors, mostly ugly photography. It just has nothing going for it. The only reason this set isn’t in last place is the card pictured to the left. This is my favorite Frank Thomas rookie card, and quite possibly my favorite 1990s Topps card period. But other than that and a big checklist, this set sucks.
#8 – 1998 Topps
I appreciate that they were trying to do something a bit different here, getting away from the white borders of the previous 7 years, but the design falls flat for me. They would do something similar the following year, but with much more success. This is another set that just doesn’t have a whole lot going for it. There are no good rookie cards, as they missed the boat on Magglio Ordonez and Carlos Lee. And the set only has 15 cards in it.
#7- 1997 Topps
1997 is the year I graduated high school, and the first year where I didn’t collect cards at all. I missed a pretty average offering from Topps. The design is pretty clean, though I wish the inner red border changed based on team colors. My favorite element is the Sox logo in the corner. There are 20 cards in the team set, which doesn’t sound like a lot, but compared to some of the surrounding sets, it’s huge.
#6 – 1996 Topps
1996 eeks out a win over 1997 in a battle of similar designs. They kept the Sox logo, and removed the red border. Both were good choices. They added a little stripe with the player name and a small image of the player’s face taken from the main image on the card. All in all this is a decent looking set, probably the first one on the list. Unfortunately, there are only 14 cards in the set, and for some reason they didn’t include a Mike Cameron rookie here, so there are no good rookies.
#5 – 1993 Topps
1993’s design is very clean and symmetrical, and is printed on decent card stock. The colors at the bottom change based on the team colors, which I always enjoy. There is some nice photography, and a good sized checklist. They also repeated the Topps Gold parallel set from the previous year, but I wasn’t tired of it… yet. There is nothing super exciting about this set, but I also can’t find anything to complain about.
#4 – 1995 Topps
1995 was the first year that Topps had a geniunely premium look. With the glossy card stock, and gold foil player and brand name, this was a step up from previous sets. It also features some nice photography, and a fairly big checklist. I also enjoyed the Cyberstats insert set. This was a very solid entry for Topps. All it needed was a good rookie card and it would have checked off all the boxes.
#3 – 1992 Topps
1992 has a classic design that incorporates team colors into the design. It also features some wonderful photography, like the Wilson Alvarez pictured to the left, and a really cool Frank Thomas card. However, I do not like the card stock here. 1991 felt classic and traditional, 1993 felt kind of sleek and modern. 1992 felt like trash. There is a big checklist, and 1992 gets bonus points for featuring the inaugural Topps Gold set. If the card stock were better, this set might be #1.
#2 – 1999 Topps
This is the second set of the decade that had a nice, premium feel to it. There is something about this set that almost feels classy to me. Very clean design, with all of the text positioned in such a way that it feels very unobtrusive. I like the little “Rookie Card” designation next to the player’s name. Nice, glossy card stock. The only thing holding this set back is a pathetic 13 card team set.
#1 – 1991 Topps
How fitting that the 40th Anniversary release earned the top spot. This set has such a classic feel to it. I like the vintage-ish card stock, the really cool Topps 40 logo, the script White Sox logo, the thin red and blue borders. Everything about the design here works. There is nothing missing. I also love the way on some of the cards where the player is breaking through the border, as you see with Sosa’s helmet in the image to the left. I also love that many of the photos feature the players in their 1917 throwback uniforms. 1991 Topps really knocked it out of the park.
We finally reach the 1980s, during which I started collecting baseball cards. 1986 Topps is the earliest set I remember collecting, though I had some 84s and 85s, so maybe I started a bit earlier. I remember I had a Mattingly rookie, though with my initials written by my mother on one of the back corners, it wasn’t worth very much!
Going forward, nostalgia will definitely play a factor. I will try to limit it’s influence, but I’m only human.
#10 – 1989 Topps
The Topps sets of the 80s kind of petered out as the decade when on, culminating in the 89 set. It’s not ugly, it’s just kind of meh. It’s basically tied with the set ahead of it on this list, so the checklist was the tiebreaker. Technically, the Ventura card pictured here is his rookie, though he has an an 88 card that reigns supreme, IMO.
#9- 1988 Topps
Another boring set from Topps. I slightly prefer this to the 89 set, solely because it has a slightly cleaner look. There is a solid checklist, especially once you factor in the Traded set. There is a really cool Baines/Fisk leaders card here. FYI, I consider XRCs to be rookies, and in my most cases, I prefer an XRC. So the McDowell & Ventura cards here elevate the set over it’s 89 counterpart.
#8 – 1982 Topps
1982 would likely be a bit higher on the list if it didn’t have that ugly facsimile signature. As an autograph collector, facsimile signatures drive me insane. Otherwise, this is a pleasant design, with the dual “hockey sticks” framing the left side of the card. The set has a nice big checklist, but nothing interesting in the way of rookie cards.
#7 – 1987 Topps
I’m sure you are surprised to see this set so low. I enjoy the callback to the 1962 set, but something about this set bothers me slightly. It has a really muted look. The Traded cards are much more vibrant, and if the whole set looked like that it might be ranked higher. We do have a nice big checklist here, with Karkovice and Thigpen rookies.
#6 – 1980 Topps
Another set that would likely place higher without a facsimile signature. Am I the only person that hates them? Otherwise, this is a pleasant looking set, with the red position and blue team flags. Another big checklist, but it’s pretty boring. The best rookie card is probably Steve Trout. I don’t know if I’ve mentioned this before, but Steve Trout once serenaded my wife at a baseball card show.
#5 – 1983 Topps
The 1983 Topps set has a nice clean design. It isn’t especially interesting visually, though it did introduce the little headshot of the player next to the player’s name. It has a rather boring checklist, though it is large, as team sets of the era usually were. There is a fun Super Veteran subset here. The base set doesn’t have any rookies, but there is a Ron Kittle rookie in the traded set.
#4 – 1984 Topps
This is where I really start to like the 1980s sets. 1984 Topps is also the first set that I’m nostalgic for. I don’t recall collecting cards in 1984, but the earliest card I remember owning was a Don Mattingly rookie from this set. Granted, my mother wrote my initials on the back, but I still loved that card. This set has an unusual but fun design, the team name down the right side and head shot next to the player name. Another huge checklist, with Greg Walker being the best rookie card.
#3 – 1985 Topps
Another fun Topps set. 1985 had an interesting, colorful design, with the slanted team name and position. It also had some fun subsets like the Father & Son and Draft Pick cards. The very large base set doesn’t have any good rookie cards, but the Traded set has Ozzie Guillen and Daryl Boston XRC’s. The Guillen card in particular is one of my very favorite 1980s White Sox cards.
#2 – 1981 Topps
I had a difficult time deciding between my #2 and #1 picks. Ultimately, nostalgia was the deciding factor, which left 1981 in the runner-up position. 1981 had a very fun design, with the little hat bearing the position and team name. I also quite like the Topps logo being on a little baseball. There was some cool photography here, with some of the most 80s baseball photos you’ll ever see. There is also a Harold Baines rookie in this set.
#1 – 1986 Topps
I’m not going to pretend that the placement of the 1986 Topps set at #1 isn’t substantially fueled by nostalgia. This is the first set that I remember collecting in real time. I specifically remember my mom buying me the Bill Madlock card at a baseball card shop in a mall in 1986. I would have been 7 years old at the time. She was a big Dodgers fan, though I never became one myself. The design here is really fun, with the team name in giant letters across the top of the card. The large Sox team set has 4 HOFers (Baines, Fisk, La Russa, Seaver), and a fun Ozzie Guillen rookie card.
Tom Orr recently took part in a signing with former slugger Sammy Sosa. Sammy is one of the White Sox all-time “the one that got away” players. Fernando Tatis is the other recent big one, and will probably end up having an even better career than Sosa if he can stay healthy.
Sorry for bringing up those painful memories! In any case, Sammy Sosa signings are very expensive, so I was only able to send in the last Upper Deck card I needed signed. I’m slightly disappointed with the quality of the pen used, but I guess I’ll take what I can get! I am officially done with all Sosa cards that I “need”.